On 16/03/2008, Roland Ramthun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > last week I started to write an application for myself that finds some > common errors in our data. > It is not finished and I use it as playground for new OOP concepts I > learn at uni ;-) > > I have now installed it on my webserver, and let it run on the extracts > generated every month. > So the statistics are regenerated when the extracts are built. > > If someone is bored and wants to start fixing the nodes which are > neither part of a way, nor a relation and have no tagging, he may have a > look. > > The URL is http://roland-ramthun.de/osm/extracts/ > > Very many features are still missing and some of the errors are > artificially introduced by Osmosis cutting the ways on the borders of > the bbox. > "Real" errors in the main DB should be red. > > Please don't use the HTML to delete something automatically, as someone > may have temporary placed some "errors" for later enhancement. > > If you want to delete something, review it by hand carefully and > preferably stick to areas you know a bit. > > Bug reports (i.e. wrong output) are welcome. >
I'll point out that it has been common practice almost since the project began for some of us to use two or more nodes at the end of a stub way to denote unfinished work. For instance I use this method a lot to denote a footpath going off a road that I haven't walked yet. Mostly I don't bother to tag those nodes. I certainly would not want these markers deleted. Cheers Andy > Regards > Roland > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk > -- Andy Robinson _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
