> On Tuesday 18 March 2008 23:43:39 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> The problem I can see with this is that the source attribute can be >> altered (or stripped). > > Which is as it should be. If an object originating from that import is > significantly altered later, then it should be possible to reflect this in > the source tag. >
That's a good question for their lawyers, do we have to maintain attribution for data which is found to be incorrect and hence corrected.... Using another (write once) tag would still enable the original upload to be recognized, even if the data is corrected at a later stage. Thinking more on how osmarender places a copyright on one side of a way, could the other sided be used for an 'attribution' tag? Mungewell. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
