On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 4:18 AM, Lars Aronsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 80n wrote: > > > I've made the following changes: > > 1) State borders are thicker > > 2) Secondary roads are narrower and the colour saturation has been > reduced > > 3) Railway lines are a little blacker. > > I have no opinion, but will add an observation that inconsistent > tagging makes for a similar or larger difference. The > Scandinavian countries need to become more consistent in tagging > before your changes will make any significant difference. > > In Sweden, one type of roads are tagged as secondary or tertiary > in different parts of the country (by different contributors). > This produces the same kind of reduction in colour saturation as > in your example. > > Railroads in Finland are rendered very black (e.g. Osmarender > zoom=7). I don't know why. Finland has not yet been re-rendered using the new style lowzoom. One of the problems with the old lowzoom was that it over emphasised railway lines. > > > Roads that Swedes tag as primary, Finns and Norwegians tag as > trunk. On the lower zoom levels (mapnik, zoom=6), the map of > Finland and Norway is full of green roads, but the map of Sweden > is almost blank (because primary roads are not rendered). > > > -- > Lars Aronsson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > Aronsson Datateknik - http://aronsson.se > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
