On Monday 24 March 2008 09:53:07 Andy Allan wrote: > If the way is tagged with highway=cycleway I don't think it needs > cycleway=track, btw.
+1 > I'm going to put together a guide for how to tag cycle paths, since > I've been contacted by a few other groups who are finding our tagging > insufficient for their needs (such as shared use vs segregated paths), > and I hope that'll clear things up a bit. Great > On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 7:48 AM, Mike Collinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As a cyclist currently in Stockholm, I personally draw a separate way > > and label it highway=cycleway, cycleway=track, foot=yes, surface=paved. I think the surface=paved is redundant too, because that is what I would expect if no surface tag was put on the way. -- just my 2c, Cartinus _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
