Dave, Not all counties have been improved through the MAF/TIGER Accuracy Improvement Project (MTAIP). Here is a link to the counties that have not been improved in the 2007 TIGER data: http://www.census.gov/geo/www/tiger/tgrshp2007/tgrshp07nomtaip.txt
Dan On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 10:53 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 13:51 -0400, Christopher Schmidt wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 10:31:11AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > > > On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 09:12 -0400, Christopher Schmidt wrote: > > > > That is exactly what I am suggesting, based on an examination of the > > > > objects in the area you're looking at: all of them have been updated > > > > several times (as the history URL above demonstrates) by a single user > > > > in what seems to clearly be a cleanup effort. (This was based on using > > > > an OpenLayers map to select 10 different streets based on the lonlat I > > > > observed in your JOSM instance and view the history for each.) > > > > > > If this is true, then we can probably go back and fix it. We have all > > > of the TIGER tlid (unique ids) for all of the uploaded data. Have those > > > remained the same in the new TIGER data? > > > > Fix... what? OSM is correct here... perhaps you mean "We can improve > > TIGER 2007 with OSM data"? > > Did I misunderstand what's going on? > > I assumed that the TIGER '07 data is better than the TIGER '05 (or so) > data that we populated OSM with. If it is better, we can update OSM > from TIGER '07. > > -- Dave > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk -- Dan Putler Sauder School of Business University of British Columbia _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
