I would view this as a citeable reference, as opposed to a copyright violation.
Cheers, Andy On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 8:48 AM, Nick Whitelegg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Have found evidence that a path I mapped yesterday has cycle rights: > > > http://www.planning-inspectorate.gov.uk/southdowns/documents/MicrosoftWord1147-13-1.pdf > > (see section 6.7.1) > > Presumably I could tag this as highway=cycleway without there being a > copyright issue? I would hope so, as this is not copied from a map - I have > merely researched an official document to get the rights on the path. > > It's not tagged as cycleway yet, just as footway, but if people think it's OK > I'll change to cycleway. > > Thanks, > Nick > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk > _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
