On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 01:33:31PM +0100, Steve Hill wrote: > But a motorway which is not a continuous road (i.e. has gaps in it) is > _not_ a single road - I see no reason why it should be treated as one. > Maybe you could cite some examples of why you need to treat it as a single > road, even though it has gaps in it?
Can we not have both?
(1) A relation which contains all the ways that define a road according
to its official designation, whether a single road, or several disjoint
pieces.
and
(2) A relation for that road's notional "route", that contains the
relation above *plus* the (usually obvious) connecting bits that give
you a single, long distance route from A to B.
Different people will find the two options useful. Or am I missing
something here?
Andrew
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
