On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Frederik Ramm wrote:

> Of course this is very simplistic and I believe you will come up with
> much better measures of progress. Let's hear your numbers ;-)

Interesting numbers.  I suspect "objects per capita" would be more 
meaningful than compressed bytes though (but more effort to calculate, of 
course :)

  - Steve
    xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.nexusuk.org/

      Servatis a periculum, servatis a maleficum - Whisper, Evanescence


_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to