On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Of course this is very simplistic and I believe you will come up with
> much better measures of progress. Let's hear your numbers ;-)
Interesting numbers. I suspect "objects per capita" would be more
meaningful than compressed bytes though (but more effort to calculate, of
course :)
- Steve
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.nexusuk.org/
Servatis a periculum, servatis a maleficum - Whisper, Evanescence
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk