Richard Fairhurst wrote: >Sent: 01 May 2008 11:13 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Wide tracks with cycle access > >Andy Robinson \(blackadder\) wrote: > >> Perhaps this is the better way to think about it. I generally don't like >> subjective tagging, but in this instance giving an opinion about how >usable >> a section of way is might be better. If you simplified bike types into >> "road", "hybrid" and "mtb" then I guess you could reasonably add say >> suitability_road / suitability_hybrid / suitability_mtb tags, or join >them >> together as bicycle_suitability=road|hybrid|mtb and leave out any of the >> values where you consider its not suitable. > >Indeed - and you probably just need one value, given that an MTB can >use anything a hybrid can, and a hybrid can use anything a road bike >can. bicycle_minimum maybe.
even better. +1 to that. Cheers Andy > >cheers >Richard > > >_______________________________________________ >talk mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
