> Relation should be IN ADDITION to identifying elements that make it up, not as > a replacement which is what is being proposed. > Areas provide physical with details that are missing from routes, but also do > not replace the basic elements such as 'railway and footway' that form part of > the bridge.
I also understand the relations as additions. The question is more about additions to what. As addition to the tags like: way1: highway=primary, bridge=yes, onway=true way2: highway=footway, bridge=yes relation1: type=multiway, way1=middle, way2=left Or as addition to the tagging scheme: way1: highway=primary, oneway=true way2: highway=footway relation1: type=multiway, bridge=yes, way1=middle, way2=left Regards, Raphael _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
