On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 06:17:41PM +0200, Gustav Foseid wrote: > On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Christian Karri� > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > i would prefer from > [2]http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Buildin > g_attributes > building:use = embassy > > That would make it hard to map embassies that do not use an entire > building and would also require information to map the building > (walking around embassy buildings with a GPS is not always possible).
Distinction made between embassies, consulates and dual-use facilities? As an example, the American embassy and the consular section in Berlin are on opposite sides of town. amenity=consulate makes some sense but amenity=embassy is semantically jarring to me. An embassy normally offers no services to the public so it seems strange to call it an amenity... -w
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
