On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Cartinus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So to sum it up: Do the ways currently tagged with "bridleway" conform to your > narrow definition or is there already no data to loose, because it is already > use for ways which are physically, but not legally paths for horses. I would consider all the existing tagging as of suspect interpretation. For example, foot=yes is almost entirely meaningless as "right of pedestrian access enshrined in law" since it's been added by default to every highway=footway in potlatch for some time. But then again, it's a wiki, so all the data will always be of "suspect interpretation" to a greater or lesser extent :-) Cheers, Andy _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
