On Jun 6, 2008, at 09:09, spaetz wrote: > But if you tag a river universally over quite a bit with layer=-1 > just for the fun of it, as was in the original example, then this > looks weird. And osmarender is right to make it look weird, isn't it?
I think this can be correct, if say a river runs in a river bed that's dug into to the landscape. So the surface of the river is always say 2m below the surrounding areas. Bridges over the river are flat. Cheers Robert _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
