noname=yes seems like a perfectly good solution. Why do you think it might not be optimal?
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:25 AM, SteveC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I didn't find much on the wiki, has anyone looked at defining streets > without names? > > I'd like to define some roads that really don't have a name so that > they drop off the noname map. > > > http://dev.openstreetmap.org/~random/no-names/<http://dev.openstreetmap.org/%7Erandom/no-names/> > > I've been adding noname:yes but I can see that might not be optimal. > Maybe name:__none__. Or something. > > Best > > Steve > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
