Am Mittwoch, 11. Juni 2008 schrieb Andy Allan: > On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Sven Geggus > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Frederik Ramm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> It's because the Mapnik layer aims to be a nice looking map and not one > >> that "has it all". > > > > Despite of this it would IMO be still much mor appropriate to render > > tracktype=grade1 in the same form as highway=service. > > > > If we don't want to have mapnik render different tracks differently we > > should at least have them in the cyclemap! > > Meh. It's on my list of things to do, but to be honest I don't see it > as very important. There's lots of things that the cycle map doesn't > render at all, and for one I see distinguishing onroad/offroad cycle > routes as more important than the difference between tracktypes; ditto
I am very happy to hear that this is on your list. I very rarely use cycle routes along roads, so I have a different opinion, but I am probably in a minority here. And at the end you do the work, so you decide :-) Thanks for the nice cyclemap. Rainer > for distinguishing bicycle=yes/no on footpaths and so on. -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk