Karl Newman wrote: > This is very common in the US, too. Sometimes there are state highways > (highway=primary or secondary) using the same road as an interstate > (motorway) for a section. Since the road in the shared section is still > a motorway, it's just tagged as such and then the ref values (highway > numbers) that apply to the shared section are semicolon separated as > Rory indicated. It might be a good idea to list the larger/more > important highway first in the ref.
Personally I think it'd be good to tag the road as primary *and* secondary, i.e. that we should have 'highway=primary;secondary'. This makes it possible to see how many km of secondary roads there are in an area, or to highlight only road 172. *However* most of the renderers can't deal with semi-colons well. Just see Dermot McNally's post in late May about "Potlatch and the evil semicolons". I don't really like mapping for the renderer though. :) Rory _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
