Karl Newman schrieb: > On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 6:59 AM, Mario Salvini <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > Victor Snesarev schrieb: > > Is there a way to deal with multiple highways using the same > physical > > roadway. For example, this stretch of road here > > > > <http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.75518&lon=-78.67926&zoom=15&layers=B00FT > > <http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.75518&lon=-78.67926&zoom=15&layers=B00FT>> > > is used by I-40, I-440, US 70 and US 64. Can anyone advise on > how this > > stretch of road supposed to be tagged? > > > > Victor > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > talk mailing list > > talk@openstreetmap.org <mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org> > > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk > > > Hi Victor, > > IMO you should solve this with relations. > > 1st relation: > type=route > route=road > ref= I-40 > > 2nd relation: > type=route > route=road > ref= I-440 > > etc. > > then you just need to add the ways/nodes to the according relation > (and > please avoid overlapping ways). voila :) > > Maybe http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations/Routes > will help here. > > Greets > Mario > > > No. This is not a logical route such as a bus route. All those > highways share the same physical way but outside of that section, they > have their own physical way. This is a key difference from a route > relation, which uses sections of multiple physical ways to form a > logical route. > > Karl There is no difference between a cycleroute, busroute, "reference-route" or socalled "superroads". Your way (using ref="A;B;C") is one way to solve the problem. But using road-relations as I mentioned is much more elegant, I think.
Greets Mario _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
