On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Jochen Topf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:16:33AM -0700, Karl Newman wrote: > > To be clear, I don't have a problem with tagging the actual location of > the > > house or building. I think it's unnecessary, but the problem I have with > the > > scheme is that it doesn't definitively link the node with the way (what's > a > > house number without an associated street?) My suggestion (the third on > that > > Thats why you should not only tag the building/node with the house > number, but with the full address. Yes, there is some duplication of > data, but its still easier than relations and doesn't break as easy. > > Jochen > I'm okay with data duplication. Could we do both, then--the Karlsruhe schema where actual locations are tagged with full address, and a relation to topologically link the house number with the closest node in the way? Karl
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
