Frederik Ramm wrote about OSM vs. Wikipedia: > 3. Not an End Product > > Working with Wikipedia, what you see is what is there: You > always have the current version of some article in front of your > eyes, and you will usually access this product with your web > browser and, ultimately, your eyes. Wikipedia does not collect > raw data, it collects/creates an end product.
This description of Wikipedia is wrong. Just like OSM, Wikipedia is about compiling free contents. How this is presented can be determined by the user, who downloads the database dump and converts it to something useful: on the web, on CDROM or in print. What you happen to see on Wikipedia's website is just one example. In this respect, Wikipedia works exactly like OpenStreetMap does. In both cases, many users are (mis-)led to believe that what they see is the one and only end product. When Wikipedia's website is one of the world's ten most visited ones, this is just a big cost, and not the purpose of Wikipedia. It would be better for Wikipedia if more readers went to other mirror websites, so that Wikipedia's servers could just serve the active contributors. -- Lars Aronsson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Aronsson Datateknik - http://aronsson.se _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
