Robert Vollmert schrieb: > On Aug 5, 2008, at 08:53, Thorsten Feles wrote: > >> Lennard voor den Dag schrieb: >>> That earlier proposal was highway=parking_aisle, not >>> service=parking_aisle (with highway=service) as it stands now, IIRC. >>> >> >> But its not getting better, the service key is already in use by the >> railways guys. Even a path is called highway in osm, why change it ? > > I don't see the conflict: For railways, service=* distinguishes between > different types of service lines, for highways it distinguishes between > different type of service roads. It's not like you're going to tag a way > with both, is it? > >> By the way, highway:service serves it well ... > > And railway:service for the other use? >
from a logical point, yes, railway:service would be right approach. In my eyes service should be used only "real" service: points not for rails or streets, they should be highway:service or railway:service Thorsten _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
