I use my Gmail account purely for OSM mailing list. A bit silly I know, but has it's advantages such as I can avoid logging in if I'm too busy to read all the subject lines.
So if you want to e-mail me directly, go for [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I'll read it sooner(and more likely to read it at all). -- Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.livingwithdragons.com 2008/8/29 spaetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 08:33:39AM +0100, Peter Miller wrote: > > I have noticed for some time that my responses to threads of > conversations > > don't appear properly in the thread structure in the archive; mine always > > seem to be treated as a new conversation. > > > This is what I do. > > > I receive the 'digests' of recent conversations. > > > I replace the subject line 'digest blar blar blar' with the subject line > cut > > from the message I am responding to > > Different mail clients handle threading differently and some are more > clever than others. The most reliable way is if a reply can refer to the > mail id that is sent in the original mail header. This won't work for you as > the digest throws away the original mail ids. > --> The most reliable way of threading is not available to you. > > Some clients als analyse the subject line and if they see a "Re: subject" > they sort it as a reply to thread "subject" (although they cannot know which > mail in thread subject it is a reply to). This seems to not work in your > mail client, but it might be that it works in other clients. > > > To cut a long story short, it's quite difficult from a digest to > reconstruct the threading structure. > > spaetz > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
