It is only loops that you need ordered elements for, for directional elements you can add 'forward' and 'backward' roles. Check out some stuff here. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations/Routes
http://www.gravitystorm.co.uk/shine/archives/2008/08/17/hill-colouring-on-th e-cycle-map/ Having said that, I think the whole public transport bit is still 'work in progress' and your idea about adding other features first might be a good idea. Regards, Peter > -----Original Message----- > From: Ed Loach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 05 September 2008 11:50 > To: [email protected]; 'Peter Miller' > Subject: RE: [OSM-talk] ferry route speed > > Peter wrote: > > > Thanks for that. The proposal does remind me of the problem in > > that we can't > > create a relationship with an ordered list of members so it is > > not possible > > to define a bus route that has a loop in it (which does > > happen). > > Oh. Can't we? Bother. Now I've got most of the Clacton roads added I > was considering adding the bus routes. The one I use most frequently > is the number 11 that passes our house from right to left (facing > the road) and stops 2 houses away, but which I have to get off about > a 5 minute walk away in the other direction as it doesn't come the > other way along our road. Sounds like it can't be done, then? The > 130 and 136 are also circular routes that only run "anti-clockwise" > apart from small sections of road which are shared in both > directions in the middle of the route. I assumed this was common > with bus routes. > > Ah well - the bus routes can wait until I've added all the schools, > churches, pubs and anything else that catches my eye... > > Ed _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
