Thanks! I'm very, very happy with S3's cost and transfer rates. I think their response times could be a bit better, especially for cases like this with large numbers of tiny files, but it's been a reasonable tradeoff. I'm excited about the recently-announced CDN features as a way to potentially address this.
-mike. On Sep 19, 2008, at 10:50 PM, Igor Brejc wrote: > Michal, very nice! > > I was thinking about hosting the tiles on S3 too. What's your > experience on this (speed, $ cost, ...)? > > Igor > > Michal Migurski wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> I'll be writing more about this over the weekend, but I thought >> there'd be interest here in some work I've been doing on Mapnik >> stylesheets for OSM data. >> >> There are some test renders available here: >> http://teczno.com/cascadenik-openstreetmap-II/ >> >> ...and a slippy map if you select the "OpenStreetMap" layer: >> http://teczno.com/old-oakland/ >> >> I'm keeping the renders up-to-date to the nearest day or so, and >> hosting them on S3. I'm covering just the nine-county Bay Area: >> http://s3.amazonaws.com/osm-bayarea/7-r49-c20.png >> >> The stylesheets are based on the Cascadenik work obtainable from >> mapnik-utils: >> http://code.google.com/p/mapnik-utils/ >> >> -mike. >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> michal migurski- [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> 415.558.1610 >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> talk mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >> >> > > > -- > http://igorbrejc.net > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- michal migurski- [EMAIL PROTECTED] 415.558.1610 _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
