> Message: 3 > Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 20:11:52 +0100 > From: Christoph B?hme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed feature for noname > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > Stefan Hirschmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > > In case of routing, I think it is a big difference if you know, that > > the road has definitely no adress. The absense of the name is such a > > strange thing, that it should be mentioned. > > But what would you do differently in a routing application in cases > where you know that a street has definitely no name compared to cases > where the name is not yet known? (Apart from telling the driver to jot > down the streetname and put it on osm). In both cases You need some > work-around to enable using this streets as destinations or navigate > through them. > > Christoph (Xoff)
There will be no differencen in a routing application, but in a mapping application. When I drive around my NaviPOWN marks red all residentials without a name. So whenever I have time I turn into that street to take a photo of the name sign. I will waste time on searching. If there is none, this will happen over and over agan. That's why we need to have a tag to turn off the name check. Lulu-Ann -- Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
