> Marc Sch?tz wrote: > >> Isn't a motorway by definition divided and therefore oneway ? > > > > A motorway yes, but not a motorway_link. > > > >> My opinion is that motorway and motorway_link must both default to > >> oneway=true, as the bi-directional varieties are non-existent / very > rare. > > > > Quite the opposite: most motorway_links around here a bidirectional, > except the small parts where they enter and exit the motorway. > > Then only the small parts that are the actual link should be tagged as > motorway_links ;) > > -- > Lester Caine - G8HFL
I agree to Marc that motorway links are often bidirectional except the ends where they run parallel to the motorway, and I really do not want the bidirectional parts to be tagged as trunks because that would result in asymetrical green parts in a blue motorway cloverleafs. I would like to have motorway links without an implied oneway=yes or oneway=no, but with a rule-checker that points out where the oneway tag is missing. As the German motorway links belong to the motorway and therefor are part of a motorway relation, I would really be odd to add trunk parts! bye Lulu-Ann -- GMX Kostenlose Spiele: Einfach online spielen und Spaß haben mit Pastry Passion! http://games.entertainment.gmx.net/de/entertainment/games/free/puzzle/6169196 _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
