Ben Laenen wrote: >> There are three options: >> 1. make no assumptions: This means every single motorway_link needs >> to have a oneway=yes or oneway=no (or oneway=-1). A pain for >> taggers, and doesn't help makers of routing applications who still >> need to handle the case where there is no oneway tag. > > Given the changing implication of oneway=yes this is actually the only > option left -- like it or not, painful or not -- since they could be > added by people who read that it was implied and by people who read it > wasn't.
Nah, it's not that bad. It just means that the only data currently in there is built on the following: Either the person assumed there was no implied value for one-way, in which case they would have explicitly tagged all of them. Or they read that oneway=yes was implied, in which case they would have only tagged the oneway=no and oneway=-1. -Alex Mauer "hawke" _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
