Matthias Julius wrote: > Stefan Monnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> Subtle vandalism will always be the hardest to spot. If it is > >> imagined that it might become a problem, then perhaps uploading a > >> change to anything which already existed could notify the last 1 or > >> 2 people that amended that feature, as they are the most likely to > >> know what is correct or be in a position to double check if they > >> doubt what they did previously. > > > > This would be very useful indeed. Not just for vandalism. > > A good diff tool or better a diff API call would be helpful as well. > With that you could periodically look over the changes in "your" area.
A completely different community project "Discogs" has following policy: - You can subscribe to news in area of your interest. - Voting on new data: Tell, how correct and accurate are these changes are. - Vote is a privilege, new users don't have vote privilege. Automatic system gives or removes privilege to vote depending on defined criteria (number of correct submissions, voting frequency etc.) - New data appear with "needs vote" flag, even if submitted by users with vote privileges. - Data with more votes are considered as valid. One then can decide to use or ignore data without sufficient confirmation. -- Stanislav Brabec http://www.penguin.cz/~utx _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk