Ian Dees wrote: > On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Alex Mauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > Ian Dees wrote: > > +1 here, too. > > > > There should be zero implied tags. Ever. > > Great, you want to go ahead and tag bridge=no,motorcar=yes,hgv=yes, etc. > on every single way where that applies? thanks in advance. > > > No, I'm saying that tags should not be added because they are assumed.
Isn't "assumed" the same as "implied" in this context? Are you taking "implied" to mean "It is implied that you must also use this other tag"? Because I've been using it to mean that there is no need to use this other tag because it is implied by the first one. IMO, highway=motorway(_link) is to oneway=yes as highway=* is to bridge=no. (and motorcar=yes, hgv=yes, etc.) in that there is no need to add the latter when the former is there. -Alex Mauer "hawke" _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
