Christiano -- Thanks for that. My guess would be that using the WMS in an OAM-external environment would actually violate the recommendation to use the i-cubed dataset only within OAM. My take on it would be that, as long as there's still uncertainty as to licensing, you should use the i-cubed data only within the OAM *website*.
Does Potlatch show it, for example? Martijn martijn van exel -+- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -+- http://www.schaaltreinen.nl/ On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Cristiano Giovando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Martijn van Exel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hey all, >> >> I'm trying to reach the OAM people to ask about the status concerning >> the license status of the i-cubed data. I would like to use the data >> outside of OAM but I can find no clue as to the legalities around >> that. http://www.openaerialmap.org/datasource/1/ states it's public >> domain but 'There is currently some question as to the licensing terms >> for this data. This is being resolved as quickly as possible. Until >> then, it is best to assume that this imagery can not be used outside >> of OpenAerialMap' sounds quite ominous to me. >> >> Any help greatly appreciated. > > > As long as you connect to OAM via WMS, you are still using it *within > OAM*. So that shouldn't be a problem. > > I am copying Chris Schmidt, he may explain better what's the permitted > use of this dataset. > > > > C > _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
