On Sat, 11 Oct 2008, Adrian wrote: > It's worth noting that it isn't possible to fork OSM on the same terms > at the moment, even keeping the same licence. > > For an example, consider where Australia will be in 50 years time. The > current OSM database can solve that problem, a fork based on the planet > dump would be unable to.
I can't fathom this either concretely or abstractly? Are you moving my home more than the odd centimeter per year of continental drift? Or if we have a big database such that Australia is a significant part - what problem are we solving?? _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
