In your letter dated Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:52:31 -0400 you wrote: >So, I think we should split the data in the following way: >1 - the user-written data, as close as possible to what's available on > the ground. >2 - a bunch of "locales", defined by the land they cover (typically > countries, states, provinces, ...). >3 - a set of rules that say how to interpret the raw data for > specific locales. >4 - A library that takes the above 3 and generates a "clean" output, > indendent from any local laws and customs.
+1 _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
