Well, isn't it time then that we then appoint administrators ? Wikipedia had them since soon after their formal launch : http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators&oldid=294538 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia#History
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:26 PM, Frederik Ramm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It is easy in cases where someone says "oops I made a mistake here, can > someone help fixing it". But in cases where someone says that someone else > is doing bad work and that someone else is not available for comment, should > I really simply remove their contributions? I don't feel I have a right to - > there is no law against bad edits! > > I really want to do the project good, but I have a feeling that reverting > edits that are considered bad by a few users is probably abusing my powers > as a script writer. I would do that for an area I know and where I could > conceivably also fix things by hand, but for Pretoria...? > > What whout the others suggest? Or do if they were me? I could of course > just publish the script (those with a clue can write their own anyway), but > would this perhaps run the risk of giving tools to clueless people that they > cannot wield properly? > > Bye > Frederik > > -- > Frederik Ramm ## eMail [EMAIL PROTECTED] ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
