Should I use the tag layer? like natural:forest landuse:tourism layer:X
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 5:27 PM, maning sambale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > In the Philippines, landcover and landuse are often interchangeable. > But they are completely different. > Land cover is the physical material at the surface of the earth, > while, land use is a description of how people utilize the land [1] > > For example, I have an area mostly covered by forest so I tag them > natural:forest. > But a mixture of landuse (sometimes conflicting), like, tourism, > quarrying, national park, etc. > How do others map this? > > cheers, > maning > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_cover > -- > |---------|----------------------------------------------------------| > | __.-._ |"Ohhh. Great warrior. Wars not make one great." -Yoda | > | '-._"7' |"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden| > | /'.-c |Linux registered user #402901, http://counter.li.org/ | > | | /T |http://esambale.wikispaces.com| > | _)_/LI > |---------|----------------------------------------------------------| > -- |---------|----------------------------------------------------------| | __.-._ |"Ohhh. Great warrior. Wars not make one great." -Yoda | | '-._"7' |"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden| | /'.-c |Linux registered user #402901, http://counter.li.org/ | | | /T |http://esambale.wikispaces.com| | _)_/LI |---------|----------------------------------------------------------| _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
