On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 04:36:30PM +0100, Dave Stubbs wrote: > They certainly lend themselves to it. That's not to say it's a good idea. > The vast majority of these things could be done instead with a much > less intrusive auto bug-notification-system. ie: a big list somewhere > telling you of all the higways; then someone can actually go and check > to see whether there is another highway there, or if things aren't > connected properly, or whether someone has attached a "note=this > really is a way for Higs and not a misspelled highway" tag.
I am in favour of feeding these kinds of bugs into OpenStreetBugs -
Possibly showing the bug as a different color knob. Having a central
repository for all kinds of inconsistencys/bugs makes a lot of sense.
I would propose to base the opening of bugs on the changes files which
will lead to false positives showing up - but after closing on
openstreetbugs to not show up again.
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49-171-2280134
Those who would give up a little freedom to get a little
security shall soon have neither - Benjamin Franklin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
