Hi,
Pieren wrote:
> I'm also surprised that the relation type=boundary is still considered
> as a proposal in the wiki.
[...]
> This is an example of "approved" relation which does not require a
> vote because it's already widely used.
There are no "approved" relations; there are those that are proposed and
those that are established. A relation becomes established once it er,
establishes itself ;-)
The formal process to move a relation from "proposed" to "established"
is to use your favourite editor and create lots of instances of the
relation where it makes sense, ideally in a way that annoys as few
others as possible.
I believe the "boundary" relation should be clearly flagged as
"established". I wanted to move it up on the "Relations" page but I find
that the "Proposed" section is much better structured, plus we have a
naming convention problem ("Relation:restriction" vs.
"Relations/Proposed/Boundaries"). Should we rename
Relations/Proposed/Boundaries to Relation:bondary?
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail [EMAIL PROTECTED] ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
