Hi, >> I prefer the second because it makes a street having no name and having no >> sign with a name impossible. >> ( If find them exclusives, since if there is no name, there can't be a name >> sign, or else there is an error) >> But if some people thing it should be possible, then I'll propose the first > I'd go for validate:noname as a key and "yes, ignore, nosign" as valid > values. And "nosign" would not suppress the error but downgrade it to warning / another color (or possibly a dashed orange line). That way people know that there is an unnamed street but that a detour to looks for street signs is pointless.
Patrick "Petschge" Kilian _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
