> However, if there is a strong opposition (but not only from one > person), then I would also suggest to re-open the proposal and try to > reply to the valid remarks/questions.
I agree with, that. However, I won't say that their are "strong oppositions", for what I have read (appart from Andy laughing, wich already makes it a good proposition for that point, since everyone likes laughing) but constructives remarks. I would put appart the chrisCF problem, wich is imho a one man problem, but of no concern with the proposal (any attempt to let him talk here has failed, any attempt to let him propose a better thing failed) and if you dig a bit in the wiki, he is just of constant bad faith, willing a fight, liking to disturb things. that is easy to solve : delete is account You want to have you opinion ? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Chriscf I bet he is the number one man of undos : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php?title=Rejected_features/Status&action=history http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php?title=Talk:Erfurt&action=history And of, course, his new ultimate suprem ~20 undos record : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php?title=Template:Map_Features:smoothness&action=history -- Sylvain Letuffe [EMAIL PROTECTED] qui suis-je : http://slyserv.dyndns.org _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
