On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 4:35 PM, 80n <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Given the very cautious approach OSM has had to copyright infringement up to > now, this does seem like a rather reckless and uncharacteristic position for > us to take, but I don't think I've heard any other proposals for how to deal > with this.
Would it be possible for CC to offer a licence transition clause for "large scale open geodata projects" in the same way the FSF has offered an FDL -> BY-SA get out for Wikipedia in the current minor FDL revision? The first addition of data to OSM after this could then be used to relicence the resulting derivative database under the new licence. - Rob. _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
