"Aun Johnsen" <[email protected]> writes: >> LeedsTracker <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> Hello all, >>> >>> I usually name bridges with name=x but this often interrupts a highway's >>> name. >>> >>> It would make sense to me to have bridge:name=x since we have already >>> have bridge=yes >> >> How about using a relation for the bridge? This would also be >> desirable because there are bridges with multiple carriageways on >> them. >> >> Matthias >> >> > What about naming the road with a relation and use the bridge's name in > the name tag? Works both ways.
Or even better: Have a relation for both. Matthias _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
