Dermot McNally schrieb: > 2008/12/20 Ulf Lamping <[email protected]>: > > > It's "doctors" that puzzles me. Why not "doctor"? I know that you are > reporting reality here, but maybe we have a chance now to document a > more consistent set of tags and perhaps the (possibly few) mappers > already using "doctors" would be prepared to retag. > >> It seemed that for these values there were no real "rivals" with equal >> meaning (maybe except for amenity=doctor used 160 times). > > That's a fair-sized minority. I wonder if the "doctors" camp contains > a small number of prolific mappers. >
You're remembering my discussions months ago about voting for tags to get a good consistent tagging scheme? You're also remembering some very prominent persons in this project mentioned that voting is nuts and we should see what is really mapped out there? Well, I'm now exactly doing this. Please tell the prominent persons in this project that the mappers out there are not able to find a consistent tagging scheme - (BTW: exactly what I was predicting). You can start a vote on changing anything - or whatever seems appropriate to change the current situation. In fact I also think that doctors is a bit insane here. But actually I no longer really take care about discussing a consistent tagging scheme ... Regards, ULFL _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
