On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 05:45:00PM -0500, Matthias Julius wrote: > Maybe we could consider to integrate other map layers into t...@h. All > the render job handling could be done by the t...@h server and either the > clients upload each tileset to a server as specified in the config or > tah hands the tilesets over to the other tile servers. The latter > would probably be better if bandwidth is not an issue.
I don't know the numbers but on hypercube, t...@h was using about 6TB/month (that was only a very rough estimation quite some time ago). So, while distributing render requests for additional layers shouldn't be a problem, I'd rather have those directly uploaded to a separate server rather than having to forward all files. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
