On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 1:11 PM, "Marc Schütz" <[email protected]> wrote: >> Doesn't layer=-1 mean that something should be 'below' the landuse >> polygons when rendering? So if you have a river at level=-1 on a >> landuse=farm, then you will never see the river because it's under the >> (default layer=0) ground. >> > > No, landuse isn't a physical feature, but a logical one. Renderers should > always draw landuse areas below all other things.
OK, let's use something non-landuse like natural=forest or leisure=park as an example then - if you have a forest at layer 0 and a stream at layer -1, would you expect to see the stream? We could also consider a bridge with a forest on top (e.g. I remember there being one in Newcastle), which should probably obliterate any layer=0 road that goes under the bridge. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
