On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 2:50 AM, Thomas Wood <grand.edgemas...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2008/12/31 Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <ava...@gmail.com>: >> On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Steven te Brinke >> <s.tebri...@student.utwente.nl> wrote: >>> The maritime borders clearly are administrative and probably are admin_level >>> 2. However, on the wiki Iceland has defined the EEZ to be admin_level 1. I >> >> It's not actually used though, Iceland only has admin_level=6 borders >> defined at the moment. I just listed all the others I could think of >> along the axis given. > > I think 1 was intended more as a continental 'boundary' even though it > may be fuzzily defined at places.
Edit out that definition for Iceland if you don't think it makes sense, like I said it's not even being used and might be confusing currently. I don't see how a continent boundary depends under any sort of "administrative" tagging. Continents aren't collectively administered, they're geographical and historical features. > In other news, I've converted the 12nm line around the UK and Ireland > to be fully tagged, so it's now showing in its own bubble on the > mapnik render. > I do note that Foula is not included in this line, so I'm looking for > details on how they were originally created so I can modify it to > include this island. Maybe I'm just imagining this but it looks like the nuances of the coastline aren't reflected in the maritime border which always looks relatively straight or curved. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
