Karl Eichwalder <ke <at> gnu.franken.de> writes: > > Frederik Ramm <frederik <at> remote.org> writes: > > > Dermot McNally wrote: > > >> I got this same error trying to operate on members of the relation for > >> route E 201, which has more than 1000 members. > > > Please do not create relations of that size, it helps nobody. > > Yes, I think the same. But what's the best way to split such a > relation? Long distance hiking routes tend to be that large and I'd > like split them, e.g., the still incomplete "Frankenweg" in Franconia, > Germany, that right now features more than 500 members and there are > probably 1000 members to come.
Introducing a new 'relation collection' metarelation, that can have only relations as members? When it comes to E-highways I don't quite understand why to use relations at all for them because they all have the int_ref tag end selecting everything tagged as E 201 should give the same result. Or is it because some road sections are belonging to more than one E-highway? _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
