On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 02:52:12PM +0000, Jon Burgess wrote: > 2009/1/22 Christopher Schmidt <[email protected]>: > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 02:42:43PM +0100, "Marc Schütz" wrote: > >> > After a recent spate of OSM activity, especially with regards to > >> > rendering and so on, I've put together a bookmarklet designed to help > >> > visualize changes to OSM data in Mapnik more rapidly. > >> > > >> > http://labs.metacarta.com/osm/up-to-date/ > >> > > >> > "Using osmosis, osm2pgsql, and Mapnik, a bookmarklet which will draw the > >> > 'current' state of the database, delayed by less than 10 minutes. Simply > >> > press this button, and an image will be drawn over the map showing the > >> > current state of the database." > >> > > >> > You simply drag the bookmarklet to your browser bookmarks toolbar, and > >> > click it on any OSM map: InformationFreeway, main map, /browse/ pages, > >> > etc. > >> > > >> > I believe that all the kinks of this particular service have been > >> > worked out at this point, though I'm happy to take any feedback or > >> > criticism you have. (Please CC me on any important feedback.) > >> > >> Great work! > >> > >> However, the rendering rules seem to be different. For example: > >> > >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.9008&lon=10.89623&zoom=17&layers=B000TFTF > >> > >> The street "Klosterstraße" has the additional name "Main-Radweg" of a > >> cycleroute relation of which it is a member. > > > > The osm.xml files are largely the same (I think I'm out of date by a > > couple commits, but they're the same other than that). I'm using the > > default.style that ships with osm2pgsql, so maybe this is doing > > something different than the main site. > > > > The only other possibility that I'm not entirely sure of the likelihood > > of is that diff parsing has messed up this relation in some way. > > > > Anyway, thanks for the feedback; I have no immediate suggestions on a > > possible reason for this behavior. > > The osm2pgsql on the main site has a small tweak so that it does not > process any route relations. This was implemented a few months back > when people objected to these routes being shown.
Is that in the default.style? Or is it deeper in the C code? (I guess another question is whether these routes are useful in the up-to-date view, since it is more of an 'editor' tool.) Regards, -- Christopher Schmidt MetaCarta _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
