Richard Bullock skrev: > I've deleted the duplicate ways - I hope that was what you wanted to do. > Thanks, that was exactly what I wanted to do.
> Presumably if there are duplicate ways everywhere (and I found 11 duplicates > on top of each other in the UK where the route relation E20 had been > created) - then this relation can be slimmed down anyway just by removing > excess ways. > I also saw the problem with E20 at another place in Denmark (on the island Fyn), in that case I did delete it with Potlach, but it is more complicated with potlach in cases where the ways are using exactly the same nodes and the '/' won't work. Maybe the E20 relation have grown too big ? At what size should it be considered to break a relation into nested relations ? ablansinger _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
