Richard Fairhurst skrev: > The important thing is that there is no prescription. No rejected. No > approved. Just easy-to-use documentation of what people are using, why. If > you feel a need for a particular tag, start using it, and document it. If > the tag is good, it'll catch on. It's much more akin to OSM-style > crowdsourcing than the rather Wikipedia-esque procedures we have at the > moment. > > Then, the people who maintain Map Features can pull out the most popular > tags and descriptions from here; same goes for Potlatch presets, JOSM > presets, and any other lists of tags.
It's an interesting idea, and I like when people come up with constructive suggestions. Just one thought: what would prevent an edit war on the data when people interpret the tags differently? I think that there still is a need for some kind of consensus. Erik _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk