Sam Vekemans wrote: > Hi all,1st off I got the page set up better now :) > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:smoothness%3Dgood > > BTW The page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness > and the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Approved_features/Smoothness > should actually be merged, as the page ALSO lists the values. > > I organized the page so we have 'discussion FOR' and 'discussion AGAINST' > so that should encourage people to list explanations in the right place. I > think that the talk page should be more for the 'Overall Wiki page > discussion', as technically speaking, the 'discussion:For' and 'against' is > actually part of the map feature proposal process. > ::We submit ideas, talk about it with examples, then refine our ideas until > a satisfied answer is found. > (in contrast, submitting ideas like headings to be changed, and > content omitted/added.. is needed for the talk page)
I don't understand: the original key:smoothness proposal was accepted, why would we need a new rfc/approval process for each separate value? If you want to propose a slew of new values to replace the good/bad/horrible series for smoothness=*, why not create a new page for that (or contribute to the existing proposed "usability" key or "surface unification") -Alex Mauer "hawke"
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
