> I suspect 2009 will see the emergence of proper OSM > walking/hiking maps so > its time we got our act together. > > Please pull the page apart and add new stuff. Ideally try to > keep content > and ideas in the same sort of format as the Cycle Route ones so > that we have > some synergy and we don't have to reinvent the wheel yet again
A bit of a late reply. In the wiki, Relation:route[1] suggests network of uk_ldp for the UK long distance path network, but Walking_Routes[2] suggests iwn/nwn/rwn/lwn for network types. It looks like the uk_ldp goes back over a year to October 2007, so there are probably a number of these already in existence. The contradiction between the two pages has also led to a relation I created based on the Walking_Routes page being amended to that on the Relation:Route one (which is understandable if people are already used to the Relation:Route definitions). I don’t know how to find out how many relations already exist tagged with network=uk_ldp - perhaps someone could find out? And perhaps someone could decide what to do about the wiki contradictions. Also on the Relation:route page the Cambridge citibus network is still mentioned in the network description, but the value in the network column has been removed (browsing the page history). Ed [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route [2] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Walking_Routes _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
