> a) that's not a quote, it's a paraphrase. > b) you're taking it out of context.
Sorry for that, but that wasn't a paraphrase either, that was the way I understood it. > weren't there. That doesn't mean we run a bot. Totally agreed, I didn't mentionned we should (or at worst not before a loooong security margin, I'm here thinking about 10^a_lot of oneway=true ) > > documentation, removing slowly support in renderers and slowly, replace > > old > > values by new values. > > That sounds like a more sensible way of handling it. Good ! > I'd document both > for a while, ha ? then why ? If we don't start by a little effort of at least stopping to mentionned them, we will never go forward, don't you think ? > specifying a preference, introduce the changes to > validators early and people can change as they find things, and you > can remove the duplicate handling and extra docs when the number as > reduced to a "low" level. I would do that too, but not in the same order. -- sly Sylvain Letuffe [email protected] qui suis-je : http://slyserv.dyndns.org _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
